# qm-music vs vLLM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | vLLM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 91/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #3 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 95 819 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 175 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v0.32.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

vLLM scores 91/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

vLLM ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; vLLM needs more configuration.

vLLM is growing faster right now (+3 175 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [vLLM](https://selfhost.directory/project/vllm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vllm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-vllm