qm-musicvsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qm-music | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 589 | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 29 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
verdaccio is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).
qm-music details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep qm-music, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with