# qm-music vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 589 | 93 053 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 259 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 259 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-uptime-kuma