# qm-music vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 17 187 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

Upptime is growing faster right now (+3 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-upptime