# qm-music vs unsloth

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 78 729 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 005 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; unsloth needs more configuration.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 005 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-unsloth