# qm-music vs Twenty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | Twenty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 60 037 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 579 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Twenty scores 84/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Twenty.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; Twenty needs more configuration.

Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 579 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty.md)

## Related comparisons

- [ERPNext vs Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-twenty)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-twenty