# qm-music vs Traefik

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | Traefik |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 24 in Reverse Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 65 401 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +446 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v2.11.60 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Traefik scores 86/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

Traefik ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; Traefik needs more configuration.

Traefik is growing faster right now (+446 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kong vs Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-traefik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-traefik