# qm-music vs tidb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | tidb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #4 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 40 685 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +98 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 ✓ | v8.5.8 · 27 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

tidb scores 80/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for tidb.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; tidb needs more configuration.

tidb is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [tidb](https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-tidb