# qm-music vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 589 | 47 728 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +21 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-text-generation-webui