# qm-music vs Technitium DNS Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | Technitium DNS Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 10 248 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +267 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v15.6.2 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Technitium DNS Server scores 77/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

Technitium DNS Server is growing faster right now (+267 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [Technitium DNS Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/technitium-dns-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/technitium-dns-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-technitium-dns-server