# qm-music vs Syncthing

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | Syncthing |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 90/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 89 847 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +937 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v2.1.7 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Syncthing scores 90/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Syncthing.

Syncthing is growing faster right now (+937 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [Syncthing](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncthing) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncthing.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-syncthing