# qm-music vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 114 295 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 547 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 547 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-supabase