# qm-music vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 13 308 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 ✓ | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-stash