# qm-music vs Stalwart Mail Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | Stalwart Mail Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #2 of 16 in Mail Server |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 15 470 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +667 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v1.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0-only AND LicenseRef-SEL |
| Main language | Java | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Stalwart Mail Server scores 79/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

Stalwart Mail Server ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; Stalwart Mail Server needs more configuration.

Stalwart Mail Server is growing faster right now (+667 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [Stalwart Mail Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/stalwart-mail-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stalwart-mail-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-stalwart-mail-server