# qm-music vs signoz

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | signoz |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #7 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 589 | 32 479 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +291 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 38 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v0.148.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

signoz scores 79/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

signoz ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; signoz needs more configuration.

signoz is growing faster right now (+291 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [signoz](https://selfhost.directory/project/signoz) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/signoz.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-signoz