qm-musicvssignoz
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qm-music | signoz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #7 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 589 | 32 479 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +291 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 38 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v0.148.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
signoz scores 79/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
signoz ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; signoz needs more configuration.
signoz is growing faster right now (+291 stars in 30 days).
qm-music details →signoz details →
Swap a project
Keep qm-music, compare it with
Keep signoz, compare it with