# qm-music vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qm-music | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 589 | 38 979 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 367 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 367 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qm-music-vs-searxng