qm-musicvssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qm-music | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 589 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
qm-music details →sdnext details →
Swap a project
Keep qm-music, compare it with
Keep sdnext, compare it with