qm-musicvsrsyslog
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qm-music | rsyslog | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #2 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 589 | 2 344 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 4 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | C |
Which one should you pick?
rsyslog scores 67/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for rsyslog.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.
rsyslog is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).
qm-music details →rsyslog details →
Swap a project
Keep qm-music, compare it with
Keep rsyslog, compare it with