qm-musicvsRadarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qm-music | Radarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 588 | 14 671 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +240 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | C |
Which one should you pick?
Radarr scores 78/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
Radarr is growing faster right now (+240 stars in 30 days).
qm-music details →Radarr details →
Swap a project
Keep qm-music, compare it with
Keep Radarr, compare it with