# QloApps vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | QloApps | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 14 452 ✓ | 6 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +110 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | OSL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

Zabbix scores 75/100 against 68/100 for QloApps, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, QloApps is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.

## Details

- [QloApps](https://selfhost.directory/project/qloapps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qloapps.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qloapps-vs-zabbix