# QloApps vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | QloApps | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 14 452 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | OSL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

QloApps scores 68/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for QloApps.

If you want the quickest setup, QloApps is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

QloApps is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [QloApps](https://selfhost.directory/project/qloapps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qloapps.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qloapps-vs-windows-arm