# QloApps vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | QloApps | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 14 451 | 16 647 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +260 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 49 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | OSL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

trigger scores 76/100 against 68/100 for QloApps, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for QloApps.

If you want the quickest setup, QloApps is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

trigger is growing faster right now (+260 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [QloApps](https://selfhost.directory/project/qloapps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qloapps.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qloapps-vs-trigger