Qinglongvssignoz
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Qinglong | signoz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 34 in Task Management | #7 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 20 030 | 32 475 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 38 |
| Latest release | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.148.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
signoz scores 79/100 against 69/100 for Qinglong, so it is the safer default.
signoz ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Qinglong.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; signoz needs more configuration.
signoz is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).
Qinglong details →signoz details →
Swap a project
Keep Qinglong, compare it with
Keep signoz, compare it with