Qinglongvsryot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Qinglong | ryot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 34 in Task Management | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 20 025 | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Qinglong scores 69/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.
ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
Qinglong details →ryot details →
Swap a project
Keep Qinglong, compare it with
Keep ryot, compare it with