# QGIS vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | QGIS | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Geospatial | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 736 ✓ | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | final-4_2_3 · 28 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

QGIS scores 81/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

QGIS ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

QGIS is growing faster right now (+115 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [QGIS](https://selfhost.directory/project/qgis) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qgis.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qgis-vs-zookeeper