QGISvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QGIS | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Geospatial | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 728 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 21 |
| Latest release | final-4_2_3 · 28 Sept 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
QGIS scores 81/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS.
If you want the quickest setup, QGIS is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
QGIS details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep QGIS, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with