# QFieldCloud vs Apache Tika

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | QFieldCloud | Apache Tika |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 246 | 4 115 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +16 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.

QFieldCloud ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.

If you want the quickest setup, Apache Tika is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.

Apache Tika is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [QFieldCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud.md)
- [Apache Tika](https://selfhost.directory/project/tika) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tika.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qfieldcloud-vs-tika