# qdrant vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qdrant | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 35 299 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +528 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+528 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qdrant-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s