# qdrant vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qdrant | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 35 301 ✓ | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +498 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+498 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qdrant-vs-zammad