# qdrant vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qdrant | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 35 300 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +529 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+529 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qdrant-vs-woodpecker-ci