# qdrant vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qdrant | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 35 308 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +505 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; qdrant needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+505 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qdrant-vs-unbagrnd