qdrantvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qdrant | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 35 299 | 39 753 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +528 | +772 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 82/100 for qdrant, so it is the safer default.
qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; qdrant needs more configuration.
qdrant details →Umami details →