qdrantvsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qdrant | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 35 309 | 713 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +506 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
qdrant is growing faster right now (+506 stars in 30 days).
qdrant details →Trinity details →