# qdrant vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qdrant | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 35 299 | 117 848 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +528 | +5 489 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 82/100 for qdrant, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 489 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qdrant-vs-tradingagents