# qdrant vs TG Vault

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qdrant | TG Vault |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #21 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 35 309 ✓ | 277 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +506 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 48/100 for TG Vault, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for TG Vault.

If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; TG Vault needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+506 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)
- [TG Vault](https://selfhost.directory/project/tg-vault) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tg-vault.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qdrant-vs-tg-vault