# qdrant vs TelegramRSS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qdrant | TelegramRSS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 35 312 ✓ | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +509 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.5.0 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 47/100 for TelegramRSS, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for TelegramRSS.

If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; TelegramRSS needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+509 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)
- [TelegramRSS](https://selfhost.directory/project/telegramrss) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/telegramrss.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qdrant-vs-telegramrss