# qdrant vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qdrant | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 35 304 ✓ | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +501 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for SyncWatch同步观影.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+501 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qdrant-vs-syncwatch