qdrantvsSemaphore UI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qdrant | Semaphore UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 35 299 | 14 334 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +528 | +151 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Semaphore UI, so it is the safer default.
Semaphore UI ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for qdrant.
If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; qdrant needs more configuration.
qdrant is growing faster right now (+528 stars in 30 days).
qdrant details →Semaphore UI details →