qdrantvsrudder
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qdrant | rudder | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #4 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 35 300 | 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +529 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 9.1.4 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Scala |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 55/100 for rudder, so it is the safer default.
qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for rudder.
If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; rudder needs more configuration.
qdrant is growing faster right now (+529 stars in 30 days).
qdrant details →rudder details →