# qdrant vs Rowfill

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qdrant | Rowfill |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #4 of 5 in Data Analysis |
| GitHub stars | 35 300 ✓ | 365 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +529 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 42/100 for Rowfill, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Rowfill.

If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; Rowfill needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+529 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)
- [Rowfill](https://selfhost.directory/project/rowfill) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rowfill.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qdrant-vs-rowfill