qBittorrentvsZot Registry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qBittorrent | Zot Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Bittorrent | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 41 211 | 2 924 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +919 | +122 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 12 |
| Latest release | release-5.3.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
qBittorrent scores 84/100 against 64/100 for Zot Registry, so it is the safer default.
Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for qBittorrent.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent is easier to run; Zot Registry needs more configuration.
qBittorrent is growing faster right now (+919 stars in 30 days).
qBittorrent details →Zot Registry details →
Swap a project
Keep qBittorrent, compare it with
Keep Zot Registry, compare it with