# qBittorrent vs Whisper-WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qBittorrent | Whisper-WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Bittorrent | #3 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 41 213 ✓ | 2 900 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +921 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | release-5.3.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

qBittorrent scores 84/100 against 62/100 for Whisper-WebUI, so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whisper-WebUI.

If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent is easier to run; Whisper-WebUI needs more configuration.

qBittorrent is growing faster right now (+921 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qBittorrent](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent.md)
- [Whisper-WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisper-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisper-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qbittorrent-vs-whisper-webui