qBittorrentvsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qBittorrent | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Bittorrent | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 41 204 | 4 115 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +912 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | release-5.3.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |
Which one should you pick?
qBittorrent scores 84/100 against 68/100 for Apache Tika, so it is the safer default.
qBittorrent ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent is easier to run; Apache Tika needs more configuration.
qBittorrent is growing faster right now (+912 stars in 30 days).
qBittorrent details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep qBittorrent, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with