# qBittorrent vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qBittorrent | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Bittorrent | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 41 203 | 47 725 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +911 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | release-5.3.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

qBittorrent scores 84/100 against 76/100 for Text Generation WebUI, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for qBittorrent.

qBittorrent is growing faster right now (+911 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qBittorrent](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qbittorrent-vs-text-generation-webui