# qBittorrent vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qBittorrent | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Bittorrent | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 41 211 | 95 346 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +919 | +2 384 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | release-5.3.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 84/100 for qBittorrent, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for qBittorrent.

If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 384 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qBittorrent](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qbittorrent-vs-stirling-pdf