# qBittorrent vs stable-diffusion-webui

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qBittorrent | stable-diffusion-webui |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 89/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Bittorrent | #1 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 41 201 | 165 172 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +909 ✓ | +67 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | release-5.3.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

stable-diffusion-webui scores 89/100 against 84/100 for qBittorrent, so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for stable-diffusion-webui.

If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent is easier to run; stable-diffusion-webui needs more configuration.

qBittorrent is growing faster right now (+909 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qBittorrent](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent.md)
- [stable-diffusion-webui](https://selfhost.directory/project/stable-diffusion-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stable-diffusion-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qbittorrent-vs-stable-diffusion-webui