# qBittorrent vs sglang

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qBittorrent | sglang |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Bittorrent | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 41 198 ✓ | 38 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +906 | +1 920 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | release-5.3.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sglang scores 86/100 against 84/100 for qBittorrent, so it is the safer default.

sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for qBittorrent.

If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.

sglang is growing faster right now (+1 920 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qBittorrent](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent.md)
- [sglang](https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qbittorrent-vs-sglang