qBittorrentvssglang
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qBittorrent | sglang | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Bittorrent | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 41 197 | 38 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +918 | +1 943 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 17 |
| Latest release | release-5.3.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sglang scores 86/100 against 84/100 for qBittorrent, so it is the safer default.
sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for qBittorrent.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.
sglang is growing faster right now (+1 943 stars in 30 days).
qBittorrent details →sglang details →
Swap a project
Keep qBittorrent, compare it with
Keep sglang, compare it with