# qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 760 | 89 750 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | +2 411 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.

If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 411 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/qbittorrent-linuxserverio-vs-world-monitor